Re: Mudsex... Uh Oh...
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:11 pm
Actually, I think the list of acts is a very good one. Although honestly I feel if we consider gruesome torture to be 'suitable' for a 12 y/o to see, there is absolutely no reason why copping a feel should be a 'grey' area. I think it would be better to phrase the guidelines not so much in terms of how old the viewer can be (because I think the dark fantasy concept of Inquisition is NOT suitable for 12 y/o kids, period), but rather in terms of the fact that we want it to be story-focused instead of pornographic. Basically, "X thrusts his xxx into Y's xxx, moaning loudly and xxx" probably adds nothing to the story, and shouldn't be done. Whereas certain sorts of 'foreplay', which involve dialogue and behaviour that embodies a character's personality, should probably be okay.
That being said, I really think this sort of thing should remain between the two people involved, as I feel it would be too difficult to enforce with all the grey areas involved. It would be a huge concern if someone felt obliged to RP things they aren't comfortable with just because MUDsex isn't disallowed (as per Kin's worry), but in that case I think the solution would be to punish people who disobey the rule of NOT forcing one's partner into controversial lines of RP that they are uncomfortable with, instead of trying to skirt around them.
That being said, I really think this sort of thing should remain between the two people involved, as I feel it would be too difficult to enforce with all the grey areas involved. It would be a huge concern if someone felt obliged to RP things they aren't comfortable with just because MUDsex isn't disallowed (as per Kin's worry), but in that case I think the solution would be to punish people who disobey the rule of NOT forcing one's partner into controversial lines of RP that they are uncomfortable with, instead of trying to skirt around them.