Davism Theme Stuff
Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 3:07 am
So, I was talking with Takta about a particularly outdated helpfile that painted Davism in a overtly negative light, and I've been noticing that we tend to have those hanging about quite a bit. Things that state 'Well, it happened this way, and some people believe this and some people believe that.' Or things that state outright the violent and subversive tactics of Davism.
As players, what we should know is that Davism is right. The knowledge that Dav could have been motivated by revenge shouldn't even be given, IMO. Everything else should be on the fringe - something we find out eventually and enjoy finding out. Personally, I always enjoy finding new ways of thinking about something, and I know that most of us know the Inquisition theme through and through, but new players don't. What they see is that Davism is inherently bad. Dav did it for revenge, the Order coerced the world by force, and what little good came from it was a sometimes charity group who enjoys barbecued mage on the weekend. And then they are told 'But that's the side the majority of people play on'. But, sometimes (oftentimes) it's not.
To me, (and this might be a whole nother discussion) Davism could be legit, y'know? Dav lost his family to mages, and the Lord chose to harness his anger into a positive force for good. That's how I like to think about it, when I'm in character.
This has gotten to be a really long winded rant by me, so I'll cut it short here. What I'm getting at is, does anybody else feel that Davism is painted in too much negativity to allow for a successful suspension of disbelief? By suspension of disbelief, I mean: do people's IC interactions suffer because they know, as players, that Davism is bad and it's just sometimes hard to back?
I don't mean to poke any buttons - and I definitely don't mean to be negative about our theme. This is something I've been wondering for as long as I've known about the Inquisition theme, because all of them give you the two sides upfront. None of them have ever been like 'Okay, here's Dav, he was perfect and there is no way that you can prove he did anything wrong unless you dig a whole hell of a lot.' I'm curious to know what people's thoughts are on the subject, especially staffers and veteran players who have been playing the theme a lot longer than my sorry ass.
This kind of comes from the idea that we, the players, do enough to discredit theme on our own - we don't exactly need help from helpfiles. So yeah, thoughts? Opinions? Hatred? Lay it on me, folks.
(The above is just opinion. I am no way saying this is how it should be and I am completely going to throw a tantrum that it's not this way. I always look at every game with, "Well, what would make it funner for me" in mind. Just food for thought!)
As players, what we should know is that Davism is right. The knowledge that Dav could have been motivated by revenge shouldn't even be given, IMO. Everything else should be on the fringe - something we find out eventually and enjoy finding out. Personally, I always enjoy finding new ways of thinking about something, and I know that most of us know the Inquisition theme through and through, but new players don't. What they see is that Davism is inherently bad. Dav did it for revenge, the Order coerced the world by force, and what little good came from it was a sometimes charity group who enjoys barbecued mage on the weekend. And then they are told 'But that's the side the majority of people play on'. But, sometimes (oftentimes) it's not.
To me, (and this might be a whole nother discussion) Davism could be legit, y'know? Dav lost his family to mages, and the Lord chose to harness his anger into a positive force for good. That's how I like to think about it, when I'm in character.
This has gotten to be a really long winded rant by me, so I'll cut it short here. What I'm getting at is, does anybody else feel that Davism is painted in too much negativity to allow for a successful suspension of disbelief? By suspension of disbelief, I mean: do people's IC interactions suffer because they know, as players, that Davism is bad and it's just sometimes hard to back?
I don't mean to poke any buttons - and I definitely don't mean to be negative about our theme. This is something I've been wondering for as long as I've known about the Inquisition theme, because all of them give you the two sides upfront. None of them have ever been like 'Okay, here's Dav, he was perfect and there is no way that you can prove he did anything wrong unless you dig a whole hell of a lot.' I'm curious to know what people's thoughts are on the subject, especially staffers and veteran players who have been playing the theme a lot longer than my sorry ass.
This kind of comes from the idea that we, the players, do enough to discredit theme on our own - we don't exactly need help from helpfiles. So yeah, thoughts? Opinions? Hatred? Lay it on me, folks.
(The above is just opinion. I am no way saying this is how it should be and I am completely going to throw a tantrum that it's not this way. I always look at every game with, "Well, what would make it funner for me" in mind. Just food for thought!)