I vote no simply because I feel it would make things confusing for new players to remove "you" and whatnot.

I guess I'll just have to RP it better then and wait a bit before responding :p

Perhaps things could be handled more subtly. As a Reeve, I already avoid this area simply as a matter of good RP, but I do think Reeves (and Knights) should be able to enter the area if they go in force. What about having a system similar to the lawless flag for the southside instead? IE whenever a ...

This thread does not live up to the promise of its title.

For a lot of people racism is a very touchy subject. I'm not going to criticize anyone for playing it up a little bit, but for me personally not being a bigot is one anachronism that doesn't affect my suspension of disbelief negatively at all. This is a game, not a simulation of real life.

Something discussed on OOC that I thought I'd post here. 1. I think these games should be based more on society than based on geography. 2. I think every game should have some balance of these three things: i) Your "influence" level among specific group(s) ii) Your expenditure of some limited resour...

What would gaining control of an area do? Who would it be open to? What would it take to control the area? Will it make sense RP wise?

I think the more fundamental question too is - will this add to, or distract from, RP?

Oh ok, then I agree yes.

One other place I'd bring that would be nice to see developed more is the wilderness around the city...

Enix - Most nobles on TI would fall more into the "being friendly with freemen" rather than the "making fun of freemen" category IMHO. Enis - It's not just a social barrier thing. For the Reeves, Order, Knights, Thieves and Manus, the interests of members of each of these guilds directly conflicts w...